Why something other than windows is likely to win the desktops

… or how to bring a really fast desktop to its knees.
I have desktop unit with Windows XP pro on it. It is my primary windows xp box. It is a nice 2+ GHz Athlon 64 with 1.5 GB ram. Pretty fast SATA disks. Single core, but quite fast.
Or so I thought.

I like to listen to internet radio while I work. Helps drown out the server noise. So I have winamp in a corner, playing something at low volume.
I have firefox open. I can’t live without it. IE just doesn’t work for me. I can’t share my bookmarks across windows, linux, others. So IE is a non-starter. That and its … uh … stellar security record … well …
I have thunderbird open. I can’t live without it. Outlook simply isn’t an option.
I use the same apps across OSes, as a large and growing number of people do. But that is another post.
This is a fast 64 bit machine, though I happen to be running it in 32 bit mode. I have VNC running, in case I need to use it remotely.
I have antivirus installed. I had McAfee, ditched that for ZoneAlarm (terrible mistake, while McAfee really isn’t good, ZoneAlarm is actively not-good). Ditched ZoneAlarm (actually ran screaming from it) for a newer McAfee. Have multiple antispyware on here. Even have Clamwin.
So I am paranoid. One has to be if one runs windows.
So the net total of all this, is that I drive CPU usage through the roof. It is pegged at 100% most of the time. Audio is choppy. Usage is painful. Sluggish. Slow.
Compare this with the Linux laptop I just retired. Running at 800 MHz with power saving on, I was doing all those things. That is, without the antivirus, spamware, spyware.
It wasn’t needed. The system was responsive. With less memory, lower processor, and audio streaming.
Do I really need 4 cores, 8 gigs of ram to run my desktop under XP?

2 thoughts on “Why something other than windows is likely to win the desktops”

  1. Not quite yet, but next year, I will make the switch to a mac. I see no reason to buy a laptop other than a macbook pro. And you don’t even have to be OS limited, since I can run a secondary OS using Parallels without rebooting

  2. While I am not an OSX fan, I completely understand. My current (new) Dell runs XP and Linux. The latter most of the time, and yes, I run OpenOffice on it.
    Too bad Microsoft doesn’t quite grasp the size of the Linux market for office apps. There may be an ego issue or a marketing issue involved … I dunno. I am not going to stop using Linux on my laptop. OTOH, in short order, when the extra memory and disk arrive, XP will be completely virtualized. I will run it when I need it (rarely).
    I suspect this is how most people would prefer to run it. I have no plans or interest in Vista.

Comments are closed.